[hist-analytic] A Chronology of 20th Century Analytic Philosophy

Steven Gimbel sgimbel at gettysburg.edu
Wed Feb 18 09:36:46 EST 2009

Brouwer's lecture at Vienna which had significant tangible effects on
the works of at least Godel, Wittgenstein, and Carnap -- all of whom
were likely in the room (we know Carnap and Wittgenstein, although there
is scholarly debate about whether Godel was present or merely got the

-----Original Message-----
From: hist-analytic-manager at simplelists.com
[mailto:hist-analytic-manager at simplelists.com] On Behalf Of
Jlsperanza at aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 9:09 AM
To: hist-analytic at simplelists.co.uk
Subject: A Chronology of 20th Century Analytic Philosophy

"Philosophy is entire -- Poodles described  as 'our man in early modern 
philosophy' is maligned: you cannot specialise in  one period like that.
He being 
described as 'our man in aesthetics' is equally  malignifying.
       Without our belief (which may be  religious in nature) that there

_is_, especially, a _longitudinal unity_ of  philosophy -- why bother??!
"The Years In Between"
Is there a _date_ in the history of twentieth century analytic
that you deem _crucial_? Tarski? Lukasiewicz? Geach? Anscombe?
In the process of compiling a chronology we should be aware that date of

publication should be expanded, in a sort of 'catalogue raisonee', to
tidbits about what lapse the publication covers. In the case of
this is particularly noteworthy.
Feel free to contribute!
In a message dated 2/16/2009 4:06:04 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
baynesrb at yahoo.com writes in "Compiling an anthology"

>Here there are two options, at least,
>within this option. One is  to include few long essays with greater
>generality of content; or,  second, to have many shorter essays
>spanning a wider field, also. For  example, on the one hand
>Chpt. 2 of Word and Object would be good, but  it's long. But what 
>about an anthology that includes short, seldom read  papers.
>Take "Ontological Reduction and the World of Numbers." Much  
>fuss has resulted from Lowenheim/Skolem in Putnam and Quine
>and  others. But in this little essay there is, I think, the basis for
>firm  intuitive understanding of what is at issue (the "proxy
>If anyone has any suggestions on content, length,  marketability,
>etc. let me know. 

Chronologies are bad! I am just reading bio of Verdi by Boden, and he
this 'chronological table' (events in Verdi's life, other events, etc.)
can make for hard reading! But I was thinking of a chronology of
philosophy. Personally, I'd do Aristotle and scholastics -- isn't
philosophy' dubbed for many, 'the new scholastic'? :)) but inspired by
("Philosophical Analysis in the 20th Century" Princeton) I guess listers
for a  
change can focus on the 20th century!
I look at myself and see that all I can provide is a list or checklist
they say, of Grice! So here it goes, bits of it
* * * * *
The 1940s. Grice was active philosophically in Oxford since the 1930s,
some of his unpublications date from the 1930s. He was impressed by what
'saw  and heard' about Vienna, he recalls in "Life and Opinions". He was
disciplined  student with Hardie. 
1941. Personal Identity, by Grice. Mind. This was when Mind was edited
Moore and had I think the subtitle, a review of psychology and
hence the title: 'mind'.
1948. date Grice gives for 'Meaning' in WOW. 
* * * * *
The 1950s
1956. In defense of a dogma (Grice/Strawson) PR -- a reply to Quine's
dogmas of empiricism.
1957. Meaning. PR. By Grice (dated 1948, apparently submitted to PR by  
1957. "Metaphysics" (with Pears and Strawson): a rather 'for-the-masses'
compiled in Pears, "The nature of metaphysics" (London, Macmillan) --  
originally one of those 'boring' (my aunt called them) 'third'
* * * * *
The 1960s
* * * * *
1961. Causal theory of perception. Grice. Aristotelian Society. This was
symposium with White (the Australian philosopher) and chaired by
Braithwaite in 
 Cambridge. Warnock seems to have been the only one who cared to publish

White's  reply, poor thing.
Austin gets his posthumous "Philosophical Papers" published.
1966. Some remarks about the senses. Grice In R. J. Butler, "Analytic  
Philosophy". Butler was an Oxonian. And this was a Blackwell title, I
There's little by way of editorial or introduction. And Grice makes a
footnote reference to Albritton and O. P. Wood -- the latter of Hereford
* * * * * 
* Grice had been appointed Professor of Philosophy at UC/Berkeley in
The 1970s
1971. Intention and uncertainty. Grice. He became a FBA, and this is the

annual Henriette Herz (sp?) philosophical trust lecture. Published both
Proceedings and as a separatum by Clarendon Press. Grice makes passing
to Anscombe, Kenny, Pears, Prichard. Meant to be a sort of reply to  the
influential essay Hart/Hampshire on "Intention and _certainty_",  Mind.
1975. Logic and conversation, ii. Published in Davidson/Harman (what I
a two-column book, in terms of format). Grice would quote from this
than  the Cole/Morgan same year reprint.
1975b. From the banal to the bizarre: method in philosophical
Addresses APA (Pacific Division -- Presidential Address), now repr. in  
"Conception of Value". Grice makes passing reference to Ramsey, Ryle,
Myro, and Wittgenstein ("No psychological predicates without
1978. Further notes on logic and conversation. iii. In Cole, Pragmatics.

Academic Press.
* * * * * 
The 1980s.
1981. Presupposition and conversational implicature. In Cole, Radical  
Pragmatics. Academic Press.
1982. Meaning revisited. In N. Smith, "Mutual knowledge" a symposium
held  in 
Sussex. Academic Press. Repr. in WOW.
1986. 'Life and Opinions of Paul Grice', part of 'Reply to Richards'. 
1987. Lot of stuff: "Valediction" etc.
1988. Actions and Events, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly. 
1988. Grice dies in August.
* * * * * *
posthumous, for another day!
I guess a more complete chronology would have dates for _Books_ by
Hampshire, Austin, Warnock, Hare, Pears, Nowell-Smith, Urmson,  Thomson,

(etc.). That would restrict us to the 'playgroup' of Saturday
A more complete chronology would add stuff by members of the "other"
led by Ryle, 'the seniors'. Few of them were 'analytic' in the broad
though. "Ordinary language", or "Oxford philosophy" being more
Another chronology would have what I call 'Grice-influential': books by

Schiffer ("Meaning", 1972), Fodor, Dennett, ...
Then someone would have to provide key dates for Quine and the Quineans,

Davidson and the Davidsonians, Dummett and the Dummettians, and some
stuff, too!


**************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2

More information about the hist-analytic mailing list