| | |
| Paragraph 1 |
If men wish to establish something about some whole, they must
look to the subjects of that which is being established (the
subjects of which it happens to be asserted), and the
attributes which
follow that of which it is to be predicated. |
| Paragraph 2 |
It is clear then that in every proposition which requires proof we
must look to the aforesaid relations of the subject and predicate in
question: |
| Paragraph 3 |
It is clear too that the inquiry proceeds through the three terms
and the two premisses, and that all the syllogisms proceed
through the
aforesaid figures. |
| Paragraph 4 |
It is clear too that other methods of inquiry by selection
of middle
terms are useless to produce a syllogism, e.g. if the consequents of
the terms in question are identical, or if the antecedents of A are
identical with those attributes which cannot possibly belong to E,
or if those attributes are identical which cannot belong to either
term: |
| Paragraph 5 |
It is evident too that we must find out which terms in this
inquiry are identical, not which are different or contrary, first
because the object of our investigation is the middle term, and the
middle term must be not diverse but identical. |
| Paragraph 6 |
It is clear then that from the inquiries taken by themselves no
syllogism results; |