| | |
| Paragraph 1 |
So demonstration does not necessarily imply the being of
Forms nor a
One beside a Many, but it does necessarily imply the possibility of
truly predicating one of many; |
| Paragraph 2 |
The law that it is impossible to affirm and deny simultaneously
the same predicate of the same subject is not expressly
posited by any
demonstration except when the conclusion also has to be expressed in
that form; |
| Paragraph 3 |
The law that every predicate can be either truly affirmed or truly
denied of every subject is posited by such demonstration as uses
reductio ad impossibile, and then not always universally, but so far
as it is requisite; |