| | |
| Paragraph 1 |
We must now start afresh and consider which of these
conclusions are
sound and which are not, and what is the nature of definition, and
whether essential nature is in any sense demonstrable and
definable or
in none. |
| Paragraph 2 |
Now to know its essential nature is, as we said, the same
as to know
the cause of a thing's existence, and the proof of this
depends on the
fact that a thing must have a cause. |
| Paragraph 3 |
Now it was said before that this method could not amount to
demonstration of essential nature - it is actually a dialectical proof
of it - so let us begin again and explain by what method it can be
demonstrated. |
| Paragraph 4 |
We have stated then how essential nature is discovered and becomes
known, and we see that, while there is no syllogism - i.e. no
demonstrative syllogism - of essential nature, yet it is through
syllogism, viz. demonstrative syllogism, that essential nature is
exhibited. |