| | |
| Paragraph 1 |
See also whether in defining anything a man has defined it as an
'A and B', or as a 'product of A and B' or as an 'A+B'. |
| Paragraph 2 |
If, however, he has said that the term being defined is not
'A and B' but the 'product of A and B', look and see in the first place if
A and B cannot in the nature of things have a single
product: |
| Paragraph 3 |
Again, see whether the whole, as produced from a better and worse,
fails to be worse than the better and better than the worse element. |
| Paragraph 4 |
Moreover, see if the whole be synonymous with one of the elements: |
| Paragraph 5 |
Moreover, see if he has failed to state the manner of their
composition: |
| Paragraph 6 |
If a man has defined an object as 'A+B', the first thing to be
said is that 'A+B' means the same either as 'A and B', or as the
'product of A and B.' |
| Paragraph 7 |
Some definitions rendered in this form fail to come under the
aforesaid division at all, e.g. a definition of anger as
'pain with a consciousness of being slighted'. |