| Paragraph 1 |
Again, if he have described the whole compounded as the 'composition' of these things (e |
| Paragraph 2 |
Again, if in the nature of a thing two contraries are equally liable to occur, and the thing has been defined through the one, clearly it has not been defined; |
| Paragraph 3 |
Also, even when one cannot attack the definition as a whole for lack of acquaintance with the whole, one should attack some part of it, if one knows that part and sees it to be incorrectly rendered: |
| Paragraph 4 |
In combating definitions it is always one of the chief elementary principles to take by oneself a happy shot at a definition of the object before one, or to adopt some correctly expressed definition. |
| Paragraph 5 |
As to definitions, then, let so much suffice. |
HTML by 
created 94/10/29 modified 1998/9/3