| | |
| Paragraph 1 |
With a view then to refutation, one resource is length - for it is difficult
to keep several things in view at once; |
| Paragraph 2 |
To counter those who refuse to grant whatever they suppose to help
one's argument, one should put the question negatively, as though
desirous of the opposite answer, or at any rate as though one put
the question without prejudice; |
| Paragraph 3 |
A strong appearance of having been refuted is often produced by the
most highly sophistical of all the unfair tricks of questioners, when
without proving anything, instead of putting their final proposition
as a question, they state it as a conclusion, as though they had proved
that 'Therefore so-and-so is not true'
|
| Paragraph 4 |
It is also a sophistical trick, when a paradox has been laid down,
first to propose at the start some view that is generally accepted,
and then claim that the answerer shall answer what he thinks about
it, and to put one's question on matters of that kind in the form
'Do you think that. |
| Paragraph 5 |
Moreover, just as in rhetorical discourses, so also in those aimed
at refutation, you should examine the discrepancies of the answerer's
position either with his own statements, or with those of persons
whom he admits to say and do aright, moreover with those of people
who are generally supposed to bear that kind of character, or who
are like them, or with those of the majority or of all men. |